Close Menu
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms Of Service
    • Social Media Disclaimer
    • DMCA Compliance
    • Anti-Spam Policy
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Deep Tech Ledger
    • Home
    • Crypto News
      • Bitcoin
      • Ethereum
      • Altcoins
      • Blockchain
      • DeFi
    • AI News
    • Stock News
    • Learn
      • AI for Beginners
      • AI Tips
      • Make Money with AI
    • Reviews
    • Tools
      • Best AI Tools
      • Crypto Market Cap List
      • Stock Market Overview
      • Market Heatmap
    • Contact
    Deep Tech Ledger
    Home»Crypto News»DeFi»$1.78M ‘Vibe-Coded’ Oracle Bug Puts AI-Coauthored Contracts Under Scrutiny
    $1.78M ‘Vibe-Coded’ Oracle Bug Puts AI-Coauthored Contracts Under Scrutiny
    DeFi

    $1.78M ‘Vibe-Coded’ Oracle Bug Puts AI-Coauthored Contracts Under Scrutiny

    February 18, 20264 Mins Read
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email
    murf


    Moonwell, a decentralized finance (DeFi) lending protocol deployed on Base and Optimism, was exploited for about $1.78 million after a pricing oracle for Coinbase Wrapped Staked ETH (cbETH) returned a value of about $1.12 instead of $2,200, creating a mispricing that attackers were able to use for profit.

    Moonwell said in an incident post-mortem that a governance proposal executed on Sunday misconfigured the cbETH oracle by using the cbETH/ETH exchange rate alone, causing the system to report cbETH at about $1.12. The protocol said liquidation bots and opportunistic borrowers exploited the mispricing, leaving roughly $1.78 million in bad debt.

    The pull requests for the affected contracts show multiple commits co-authored by Anthropic’s Claude Opus 4.6, prompting security auditor Pashov to publicly flag the incident as an example of artificial intelligence-written or AI-assisted Solidity backfiring. 

    Speaking to Cointelegraph about the incident, he said that he had linked the case to Claude because there were multiple commits in the pull requests that were co-authored by Claude, meaning that “the developer was using Claude to write the code, and this has led to the vulnerability.”

    aistudios

    Pashov cautioned, however, against treating the flaw as uniquely AI-driven. He described the oracle issue as the kind of mistake “even a senior Solidity developer could have made,” arguing that the real problem was a lack of sufficiently rigorous checks and end-to-end validation.

    Vulnerable code led to Moonwell exploit. Source: Pashov

    Initially, he said that he believed there had been no testing or audit at all, but later acknowledged that the team said it had unit and integration tests in a separate pull request and had commissioned an audit from Halborn. 

    In his view, the mispricing “could have been caught with an integration test, a proper one, integrating with the blockchain,” but he declined to criticise other security firms directly.

    Related: How South Korea is using AI to detect crypto market manipulation

    Small loss, big governance questions

    The dollar amount of the exploit is small compared to some of DeFi’s largest incidents, such as the Ronin bridge exploit in March 2022, where attackers stole more than $600 million, or other nine-figure bridge and lending protocol hacks. 

    What makes Moonwell notable is the mix of AI co-authorship, a basic-seeming price configuration failure on a major asset, and existing audits and tests that failed to catch it. 

    Pashov said his own company would not fundamentally change its process, but if code appeared “vibe coded,” his team would “have a bit more wide open eyes” and expect a higher density of low-hanging issues, even though this particular oracle bug “was not that easy” to spot.

    “Vibe coding” vs disciplined AI use

    Fraser Edwards, co-founder and CEO of cheqd, a decentralized identity infrastructure provider, told Cointelegraph that the debate around vibe coding masks “two very different interpretations” of how AI is used. 

    Related: How AI crypto trading will make and break human roles

    On one side, he said, are non-technical founders prompting AI to generate code they cannot independently review; on the other, experienced developers using AI to accelerate refactors, pattern exploration and testing inside a mature engineering process.

    AI-assisted development “can be valuable, particularly at the MVP [minimal viable product] stage,” he noted, but “should not be treated as a shortcut to production-ready infrastructure,” especially in capital-intensive systems like DeFi.

    Edwards argued that all AI-generated smart contract code should be treated as untrusted input, subject to strict version control, clear code ownership, multi-person peer review and advanced testing, especially around high-risk areas such as access controls, oracle and pricing logic, and upgrade mechanisms.

    “Ultimately, responsible AI integration comes down to governance and discipline,” he said, with clear review gates, separation between code generation and validation, and an assumption that any contract deployed in an adversarial environment may contain latent risk.

    Magazine: South Korea gets rich from crypto… North Korea gets weapons

    Cointelegraph is committed to independent, transparent journalism. This news article is produced in accordance with Cointelegraph’s Editorial Policy and aims to provide accurate and timely information. Readers are encouraged to verify information independently. Read our Editorial Policy https://cointelegraph.com/editorial-policy



    Source link

    binance
    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
    CryptoExpert
    • Website

    I’m someone who’s deeply curious about crypto and artificial intelligence. I created this site to share what I’m learning, break down complex ideas, and keep people updated on what’s happening in crypto and AI—without the unnecessary hype.

    Related Posts

    DAOs May Need To Ditch Decentralization To Court Institutions

    March 17, 2026

    How a 2.85% Price Error Triggered $27M in Liquidations on Aave

    March 17, 2026

    Aave to Roll Out Aave Shield After $50M User Loss Incident

    March 16, 2026

    Bonk.fun Domain Hijacked to Push Crypto Wallet Drainer

    March 14, 2026
    Add A Comment
    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    notion
    Latest Posts

    Bitmine Immersion Technologies Crosses 4.59 million ETH After Purchasing 60,999 Tokens in a Single Week

    March 17, 2026

    DAOs May Need To Ditch Decentralization To Court Institutions

    March 17, 2026

    Bitcoin Bollinger Bands Setting Up BTC Price for “Powerful Move”

    March 17, 2026

    Stocks Settle Sharply Higher as Crude Oil Slumps

    March 17, 2026

    How to Build High-Performance GPU-Accelerated Simulations and Differentiable Physics Workflows Using NVIDIA Warp Kernels

    March 17, 2026
    quillbot
    LEGAL INFORMATION
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms Of Service
    • Social Media Disclaimer
    • DMCA Compliance
    • Anti-Spam Policy
    Top Insights

    Wife Uses CCTV To Pocket $176 Million

    March 17, 2026

    10 High Income Skills For Your 20s That AI Won’t Replace

    March 17, 2026
    binance
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram Pinterest
    © 2026 DeepTechLedger.com - All rights reserved.

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.