Bitdeer’s latest operating update has revealed a concrete insight into the recent Bitcoin miner-AI pivot: the company produced far more Bitcoin but ended the month with far fewer coins than it held a year earlier.
The company reported 921 BTC mined in May 2026, up 370% year over year, while BTC held at month-end stood at 171. In its May 2025 update, Bitdeer reported that it had mined 196 BTC and held 1,351 BTC.
That split sets up a sell-pressure question inside the miner-AI pivot. Bitdeer is asking investors to value a mining fleet, proprietary ASICs, power sites, AI cloud capacity, and future colocation revenue as a single business. The Bitcoin balance shows how much of that strategy still depends on converting mined coins into operating liquidity.
The answer is mixed. AI revenue may become a cash buffer that reduces the need to sell coins into weak mining economics. The May and first-quarter disclosures show a company producing more BTC while carrying a much smaller coin stack, alongside an AI infrastructure business that brings a different set of risks.
The BTC gap is the clearest signal
The May comparison is stark because the two numbers move in opposite directions. Production rose from 196 BTC to 921 BTC, while BTC held fell from 1,351 to 171.
[Caveat: Bitdeer’s May 2026 figure includes BTC from self-mining and co-mining, while the May 2025 release labeled its mined BTC as self-mining only. Even with that distinction, the scale of the holdings gap is hard to miss.]
MetricMay 2025May 2026What changedBTC mined196921Output rose roughly 4.7 times year over year.BTC held1,351171The reported coin balance was about 87% lower.Self-mining hashrate13.6 EH/s70.2 EH/sBitdeer scaled the mining base materially.AI Cloud ARRNot disclosed in the monthly tableAbout $69 millionAI cloud is now a central operating metric.Tydal statusInfrastructure work underwayAdvanced colocation negotiationsThe site has become a core AI infrastructure test.
Using CryptoSlate Bitcoin pricing in the roughly $62,700 to $62,900 range on June 19, Bitdeer’s May production was worth about $57.9 million, and its month-end BTC balance was worth about $10.7 million.
Those are rough spot estimates rather than company-reported dollar values, yet they show the order of magnitude. The month’s production was large enough to matter, while the retained coin balance remained modest relative to the operating scale.
Monthly BTC held is a point-in-time balance, not a full flow-of-funds bridge. The figure alone cannot show how much of May’s production was sold, pledged, retained, or otherwise used. It does show that higher production had yet to translate into a larger Bitcoin treasury.
For a Bitcoin miner moving into AI infrastructure, that difference changes the investment question: new revenue can either help the company hold more BTC or fund a more capital-intensive buildout.
The first-quarter numbers lend more weight to the May update. In its Q1 2026 results, Bitdeer reported mining 2,033 BTC, up from 350 BTC in Q1 2025. BTC held was 31 at quarter-end, down from 1,156 a year earlier. The company also disclosed $206.8 million of proceeds from the disposal of digital assets.
Bitdeer’s mining revenue rose sharply as its fleet expanded, while the balance-sheet line moved like a company actively turning mined assets into capital for operations and growth.
The quarter also included $346.9 million of net cash used in operating activities, $93.7 million of capital expenditures for data center infrastructure, GPU procurement, tariffs, and mining rigs delivered to data centers, and a balance sheet with $1.9 billion in borrowing.
Bitdeer also reported $188.9 million in Q1 revenue, positive adjusted EBITDA of $14.4 million, and $297.7 million in cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash.
It is running a large capital program that uses Bitcoin, debt, and infrastructure investment as interconnected parts of the same strategy.
AI revenue changes the cash question
Bitdeer’s AI Cloud metrics are the strongest argument for an optimistic future. In May, the company said AI Cloud ARR held near $69 million at 90% GPU utilization, with 4,248 GPUs deployed and 3,305 GPUs under external subscription. It also launched two NVIDIA GB300 NVL72 clusters and added support for NVIDIA Nemotron 3 through its model studio.
The ARR figure had already moved sharply before May. Bitdeer’s March update put AI Cloud ARR near $43 million. Its April update said ARR had climbed to about $69 million. May showed that level holding, which makes the update a test of durability rather than a fresh acceleration.
ARR is a run-rate metric. In Q1, Bitdeer recognized $3.7 million of AI Cloud revenue. The gap matters because ARR indicates potential future revenue visibility, while recognized revenue reflects revenue that has already flowed through the income statement. A $69 million annualized figure can strengthen the case for a less BTC-dependent business, but the cash benefits still have to show up against power bills, interest costs, capex, and mining volatility.
This is where Bitdeer’s update hones a broader miner-AI debate. Recent CryptoSlate coverage showed that Wall Street has been paying higher valuations for Bitcoin miners with AI and HPC capacity before much of that capacity is delivered. Bitdeer’s May release adds a company-level version of that question: what happens when the AI story is already large enough to report, while the Bitcoin balance still shows limited retention?
For Bitcoin miners, the best AI cloud and colocation options are straightforward. Contracted compute revenue can smooth cash generation, reduce dependence on selling mined BTC during weak periods, and make power assets valuable beyond hashprice.
The harder version is equally clear. Building AI infrastructure takes capital, customers, delivery discipline, and time. During that transition, the BTC treasury can remain a source of liquidity rather than a long-term reserve.
Tydal turns the pivot into execution risk
Tydal, Norway, is the clearest physical proof of Bitdeer’s changing model. In March, Bitdeer said its Tydal Data Center subsidiary had engaged Data Center Installations AS to develop and convert the facility into an 180 MW AI data center, primarily for the colocation of NVIDIA Vera Rubin technology. The company said completion was anticipated as early as December 2026.
In May, Bitdeer said Tydal was in advanced negotiations with a potential colocation tenant and described the site as a visible proof point for converting owned power into long-duration contracted revenue.
That’s the promise of the AI pivot in one sentence: power sites that once supported mining can become infrastructure for customers tied to contracted compute revenue rather than BTC-priced mining output.
Risk changes with the revenue model. Bitcoin mining exposes Bitdeer to hashprice, difficulty, fees, energy costs, machine efficiency, and the price of BTC. AI colocation introduces potential exposure to tenant quality, delivery milestones, GPU supply, construction timing, power allocation, contract terms, and capital costs. The risk may become more predictable, but it moves elsewhere.
Bitdeer’s May update therefore reads less like a victory lap and more like a live operating test. Earlier CryptoSlate coverage of Bitdeer’s February treasury drawdown showed why the question exists: a Bitcoin miner can keep producing Bitcoin while still using coins as liquidity to finance and grow.
For now, Bitdeer has scaled production, rebuilt some BTC holdings from the March low, held AI ARR near $69 million, and moved deeper into AI colocation. The missing link is a clearer bridge from AI run-rate to durable cash flow and from mined BTC to retained BTC.
If that bridge appears, Bitdeer’s AI business could become a buffer against routine Bitcoin sales. If it fails to appear, the pivot may simply change the form of exposure: fewer coins on the balance sheet, more dependence on contracted compute, and a larger execution burden tied to power sites, customers, and capital markets.
That is the question Bitdeer’s May update leaves open. The company mined 921 BTC, but the more important number may be 171: the amount of Bitcoin it still held at the end of the month.
